| Index | Contacts | HA PIs | Trust PIs | NHS Performance Indicators : February 2002 |
![]() |
|---|
Introduction
Why publish NHS Performance Indicators?
These indicators are an important part of the Government’s commitment to improve the quality of clinical and other performance information that patients receive. Patients and the public have a right to know how well different NHS organisations are performing. Different NHS organisations also need to know how well they are doing in comparison with others, so that successes can be shared and weaknesses can be identified and acted upon. This detailed publication shows the results of each health authority and hospital trust in England for a wide range of indicators. It accompanies the recent publication of NHS Performance Indicators, National Figures: February 2002, which provided a high level national summary of the information now being published for each health authority and hospital trust.
What do the indicators tell us?
These indicators give a summary of what is going on across the NHS. They cover vital services such as treatment for heart disease, cancer and mental health. They also cover other issues that really matter to patients, such as how long they have to wait to be admitted to hospital, how clean their hospitals are and how easily they can get to see their GP. The indicators also tell us about the overall health of the population, how efficiently the health service is being managed and how well staffed it is.
This document details how performance has improved over the last year. The data show real improvements across most indicators. There has been a marked improvement in rates of cataract removal and joint replacements, death rates following surgery and death rates from circulatory diseases, but indicators for vacancy rates and cervical cancer screening show a small decline in performance. The overall picture is one of real progress but there remains considerable and unacceptable variation in performance.
In a truly national health service patients have a right to expect consistently high standards of treatment and care wherever they live. The Government is determined to tackle these inequalities in the provision and outcome of health care. Sometimes variations can be partly explained by particular local circumstances, such as the overall prosperity of the area, but in many cases they cannot. Health authorities and NHS trusts with deteriorating performance on these indicators will need to take action locally to improve their position and thus contribute to a narrowing of the health inequalities gap.
The indicators show some of the significant improvements being made and also some areas where health authorities particularly need to target action. Some of the main points are as follows:
How are the indicators presented?
For each indicator a graph shows the relative performance of every health authority or hospital trust in England. For the majority of indicators, where comparable earlier data are available, a second graph shows whether performance has improved or deteriorated for each health authority or hospital trust. At the start of each section a brief commentary offers contextual information where relevant and technical definitions for the indicators in that area, but this is kept to a minimum so that the graphs can speak for themselves.
The indicators are grouped into different categories or areas according to the NHS Performance Assessment Framework (PAF). The PAF has been designed to ensure that all areas of NHS performance are measured in a balanced way, so that NHS organisations, their patients and the public get a fair and more rounded view of how well their hospital trusts and health authorities are doing. The PAF enables NHS managers and clinicians to compare different key elements of performance and understand how changes in one area may have implications for others.
The health authority PAF comprises six areas of performance which, taken together, give a balanced view of the performance of the NHS:
1 Health improvement;
2 Fair access;
3 Effective delivery of appropriate health care;
4 Efficiency;
5 Patient/carer experience; and
6 Health outcomes of NHS care.
The PAF for NHS hospital trusts is similar and is designed to complement the information contained in the health authority PAF. It will enable hospital trusts to assess and compare their performance against a full range of measures. It has four areas:
A Clinical effectiveness and outcomes;
B Efficiency;
C Patient/carer experience; and
D Capacity & capability.
There is also a PAF for Personal Social Services with a set of accompanying performance indicators, published in Social Services Performance Assessment Framework Indicators, 2000-2001 (October 2001) and at www.doh.gov.uk/paf. This includes some "interface" indicators, which also feature in the health authority PAF. Increasingly health and social services must work together to improve the care that people receive, so both health authorities and councils with social services responsibilities will be held accountable for performance against these indicators.
Why were these particular indicators chosen?
The purpose of the indicator sets is to provide a high level summary of NHS performance, reflecting as fully as possible the functions of the health service and the wide range of services patients receive. In particular, the indicators should reflect the priorities that have been set for the health service and measure progress against key standards and targets. Consequently the indicator sets are constantly being developed and improved as new sources of information become available. This publication better reflects key service standards as defined in the National Service Frameworks and includes a broader range of clinical indicators, which reflect the quality of treatment that patients receive. By the time the next indicator sets are published information from a national programme of patient and staff surveys will also be available to better reflect people’s experiences of the NHS.
This publication has been informed by an extensive public consultation exercise – a key part of the Government’s programme to develop and improve the indicators. The development programme involves the Department of Health working closely with the Commission for Health Improvement as it moves towards taking over responsibility for publishing the Performance Indicators. We are committed to an ongoing annual consultation process, to ensure that the NHS and others with relevant knowledge and interest are able to influence the development of performance indicators. A summary of the findings of the first consultation, held over summer 2001, and the Government’s response can be found in Annex D of this document. A more detailed account of the responses to each of the issues raised in the consultation can be found on the Performance Indicators website at www.doh.gov.uk/nhsperformanceindicators/2002.
How can the indicators help to improve the performance of the health service?
As part of this indicator publication summary reports have been prepared for the boards of hospital trusts, the new health authorities, as well as their host primary care trusts and primary care groups. Although they are designed for NHS management use, these reports are public documents and can be found on the website at www.doh.gov.uk/nhsperformanceindicators/2002. Each report is customised for the health authority or hospital trust concerned and presents a summary of its performance on all the indicators. The board of each organisation will consider its report carefully, paying particular attention to any areas of relatively poor performance, and take whatever action is appropriate to try to ensure that overall performance improves and services to patients are enhanced.
During 2001, the Government announced plans to shift the balance of power within the NHS towards frontline staff and patients. The aim is to re-shape the NHS around the needs of its users, the patients and in so doing to satisfy a major objective of the NHS Plan. The 95 existing English health authorities are to be abolished on 1 April 2002 when 28 new, larger and more strategic health authorities will be established. Subject to passage of the NHS Reform and Health Care Professions Bill, these health authorities are expected to be re-designated Strategic Health Authorities (StHAs) later in 2002.
Strategic Health Authorities will be responsible for creating coherent strategic frameworks for the health service in their area, securing annual performance agreements and for performance management of their local Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) and NHS Trusts. Around 300 PCTs will have responsibility for assessing the health needs of their community, commissioning services and securing greater integration of health and social care. We would therefore expect StHAs and PCTs boards to consider the relevant performance indicator summary reports for their areas as well, to inform their own action and planning.
The Government is keen to promote the analysis of performance indicators by NHS managers, clinicians and other experts in the field. By comparing their results with each other, and gaining a better understanding of the underlying reasons for varying levels of performance, NHS organisations are better placed to take the appropriate action to bring about improvements. This process is known as benchmarking. For benchmarking to be effective, the health service needs access to as wide a range of reliable performance information as possible. These indicators support this process, but they are only the tip of the iceberg. NHS organisations have access to a wide range of local data, which help them to understand the level of service they are providing. But there is also a further set of national data, known as benchmarking indicators, which will shortly become available to support this process. These benchmarking indicators provide information on specific focused areas of the health service, which are covered at a high level by the NHS Performance Indicators. Although the benchmarking indicators are designed particularly for NHS use, we will be making them available on the Department of Health website. NHS staff with access to the NHSweb will also be able to access both sets of indicators, with software provided to analyse them.
How will the reporting of NHS performance indicators develop in the future?
The Government has made a clear commitment that publication of NHS Performance Indicators will be transferred to the independent Commission for Health Improvement (CHI), which will take full responsibility for publication in 2003. The next sets of performance indicators, planned for summer 2002, will be published jointly by the Department of Health and CHI.
The indicators to be published in summer 2002 will appear as part of the Performance "star" Ratings system. This system uses performance indicators and any relevant assessments made by CHI to give NHS organisations an overall performance rating. The first Performance Ratings publication, in September 2001, was restricted to non-specialist acute (hospital) trusts and can be found on the Department of Health’s website at www.doh.gov.uk/performanceratings. The summer 2002 Performance Ratings will apply to all types of NHS trust: acute (hospital) trusts, specialist hospital trusts, ambulance trusts, community and mental health trusts, and primary care trusts.
HEALTH AUTHORITY INDICATOR LIST
|
PAF area |
Indicator Number |
Indicator Name |
Detailed Name |
|
1 |
(i) |
Life expectancy (male) |
Estimated number of years a male is expected to live, based on the mortality rates of the area |
|
1 |
(ii) |
Life expectancy (female) |
Estimated number of years a female is expected to live, based on the mortality rates of the area |
|
1 |
(iii) |
Deaths from cancer |
Mortality rate from all malignant neoplasms in people aged under 75 per 100,000 population (age-standardised) |
|
1 |
(iv) |
Deaths from circulatory diseases |
Mortality rate from all circulatory diseases in persons aged under 75 per 100,000 population (age-standardised) |
|
1 |
(v) |
Suicide rates* |
Mortality rate from suicide and injury undetermind whether accidentally or purposely inflicted per 100,000 population (age-standardised) |
|
1 |
(vi) |
Deaths from accidents |
Mortality rate from accidents per 100,000 population (age-standardised) |
|
1 |
(vii) |
Conceptions below age 18 |
Number of conceptions among girls aged under 18 resident in an area per 1,000 girls aged 15-17 years resident in the area |
|
1 |
(viii) |
Decayed, missing or filled teeth in five year old children |
Average number of teeth per 5 year old child which are either actively decayed, missing or filled |
|
1 |
(ix) |
Infant mortality rates |
Number of deaths in infants under one year per 1,000 live births |
|
2 |
(i) |
Breast cancer screening |
Percentage of women aged 50-64 screened for breast cancer |
|
2 |
(ii) |
Cervical cancer screening |
Percentage of women aged 25-64 screened for cervical cancer |
|
2 |
(iii) |
Surgery rates for coronary heart disease |
Surgery rate for coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCAs) per million population (age and sex standardised) |
|
2 |
(iv) |
Surgery rates for joint replacement |
Elective surgery rate for hip and knee replacements per 100,000 population (age and sex standardised) |
|
2 |
(v) |
Surgery rates for cataract removal |
Elective surgery rate for cataracts per 100,000 population (age and sex standardised) |
|
2 |
(vi) |
Number of GPs |
Number of whole-time equivalent GPs per 100,000 population |
|
2 |
(vii) |
Increase in drug misusers accessing drug treatment services |
Percentage increase in number of problem drug misusers accessing drug treatment services (excluding referrals from the criminal justice service) per thousand resident population aged 15-44 years, between 1999/00 and 2000/01 |
|
3 |
(i) |
Childhood immunisations |
Percentage of children immunised against MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) and diphtheria by age 2 |
|
3 |
(ii) |
Flu vaccinations |
Persons vaccinated against flu as a percentage of number of people aged 65 and over |
|
3 |
(iii) |
Returning home following hospital treatment for stroke |
Percentage of patients discharged back to usual place of residence within 56 days of emergency admission to hospital with a stroke, aged 50 and over (age and sex standardised) |
|
3 |
(iv) |
Returning home following hospital treatment for fractured hip |
Percentage of patients discharged back to usual place of residence within 28 days of emergency admission to hospital with a hip fracture, aged 65 and over (age and sex standardised) |
|
3 |
(v) |
Primary care management - acute conditions |
Emergency admission rate for acute ear, nose and throat infection, kidney/urinary tract infection and heart failure per 100,000 population (age and sex standardised) |
|
3 |
(vi) |
Primary care management - chronic conditions |
Emergency admission rate for asthma and diabetes per 100,000 population (age and sex standardised) |
|
3 |
(vii) |
Mental health in primary care |
Prescribing rate of Benzodiazepines (age-standardised) |
|
3 |
(viii) |
Prescribing of antibacterial drugs |
Prescribing rate of antibacterial drugs (age-standardised) |
|
3 |
(ix) |
Prescribing of ulcer healing drugs |
Prescribing rates of ulcer healing drugs (age-standardised) |
|
3 |
(x) |
Organ donors |
Number of cadaveric heart beating solid organ donors per million population |
|
4 |
(i) |
Day case rate |
Ratio of observed to expected day case rate for a basket of 25 procedures, adjusted for differences in casemix |
|
4 |
(ii) |
Length of stay |
Ratio of observed to expected length of stay, adjusted for differences in casemix |
|
4 |
(iii) |
Generic prescribing |
Number of generic prescription items as a percentage of all prescription items |
|
4 |
(iv) |
Missed outpatient appointments |
Percentage of first outpatients appointments for which patient did not attend |
|
4 |
(v) |
Data quality |
Summary measure of Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data quality for NHS trusts with in-patient activity |
|
5 |
(i) |
Six month inpatient waits |
Percentage of patients waiting less than 6 months for an inpatient admission |
|
5 |
(ii) |
Thirteen week outpatient waits |
Percentage of patients seen within 13 weeks of GP written referral for first outpatient appointment |
|
5 |
(iii) |
Two week cancer waits |
Percentage of patients seen within two weeks of urgent GP referral to outpatient appointment with specialist |
|
5 |
(iv) |
Delayed discharges** |
Number of patients whose discharge from hospital was delayed, as a percentage of all patients in hospital |
|
5 |
(v) |
Access to a GP |
Percentage of practices with an appointment system who can offer a patient an appointment to see a GP within 2 working days |
|
6 |
(i) |
Emergency admissions** |
Number of health authority commissioned non-elective General & Acute admissions per 1,000 population |
|
6 |
(ii) |
Emergency admissions to hospital for children with lower respiratory infections |
Number of emergency admissions to hospital of children aged under 16 with lower respiratory infections, per 100,000 resident children (age and sex standardised) |
|
6 |
(iii) |
Psychiatric readmissions** |
Number of emergency psychiatric readmissions of patients (aged 16-64), within 90 days of discharge from the care of a psychiatric specialist as a percentage of such discharges |
|
6 |
(iv) |
Emergency readmission to hospital following discharge |
Emergency readmissions to hospital within 28 days of discharge (all ages), as a percentage of live discharges (age and sex standardised) |
|
6 |
(v) |
Emergency readmission to hospital following treatment for a fractured hip |
Emergency readmissions to hospital within 28 days of discharge following treatment for a fractured hip, as a percentage of live hip fracture discharges (age and sex standardised) |
|
6 |
(vi) |
Emergency readmission to hospital following treatment for a stroke |
Emergency readmissions to hospital within 28 days of discharge following a stroke, as a percentage of live stroke discharges (age and sex standardised) |
|
6 |
(vii) |
Breast cancer survival |
Five year relative survival rates of women aged 15-99 who were diagnosed with breast cancer during the respective time periods |
|
6 |
(viii) |
Lung cancer survival |
Five year relative survival rates of persons aged 15-99 who were diagnosed with lung cancer during the respective time periods |
|
6 |
(ix) |
Colon cancer survival |
Five year relative survival rates of persons aged 15-99 who were diagnosed with colon cancer during the respective time periods |
|
6 |
(x) |
Death within 30 days of surgery (non-elective admissions) |
Deaths within 30 days of surgery for non-elective admissions to hospital, per 100,000 patients (age and sex standardised, includes deaths in hospital and after discharge) |
|
6 |
(xi) |
Death within 30 days of a heart bypass operation |
Deaths within 30 days of a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), per 100,000 patients (age and sex standardised, includes deaths in hospital and after discharge) |
|
6 |
(xii) |
Death within 30 days of admission to hospital with a fractured hip |
Deaths within 30 days of emergency admission to hospital with a hip fracture, of patients aged 65 and over, per 100,000 patients (age and sex standardised, includes deaths in hospital and after discharge) |
|
6 |
(xiii) |
Death within 30 days of admission to hospital with a stroke |
Deaths within 30 days of emergency admission to hospital following a stroke, per 100,000 patients (age and sex standardised, includes deaths in hospital and after discharge) |
|
6 |
(xiv) |
Death within 30 days of surgery (elective admissions) |
Deaths within 30 days of surgery for elective admissions to hospital, per 100,000 patients (age and sex standardised, includes deaths in hospital and after discharge) |
|
6 |
(xv) |
Four-week smoking quitters |
Number of smokers who had quit at four week follow-up with NHS smoking cessation services per 100,000 population aged 16 and over |
Notes:
* to be an interface indicator in the future
** current interface indicator, which also features in the Personal Social Services PAF